As part of Europeana’s 2019 and 2020 annual conferences, we assessed their environmental impact as physical and digital conferences respectively. You can read more about each impact assessment on Europeana Pro but here we share our approach and methodology. We might think that a digital conference has no environmental impact - after all, there is no travel. But this is not the case. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, we held Europeana 2020 online and calculated what the scale of its carbon footprint was likely to be. We compared this against the carbon footprint of air travel to Europeana 2019. In all of this, we had to develop our own methodologies, so each finding is an estimate and over time the methodology is likely to improve. Europeana 2019 | We assessed the environmental cost of air travel to the conference (held in Lisbon). We emerged with an average environmental cost (carbon outputs) caused by air travel that we could use in the future. We were able to evaluate whether the off-setting that Europeana invested in was appropriate. The offsetting covered the cost of the air-travel. We did not estimate the other environmental emissions (e.g. caused by hotel stays, the venue that the conference was hosted in, the food eaten by participants, travel by other means than plane e.g. by car or train)
| Europeana 2020 | We attempted to assess the air travel emissions saved by having a fully-digital conference. We assessed the hypothetical cost of air travel had the conference been held in person. We calculated a range of environmental emissions that could have been caused by each participant connecting digitally.
|
| Panel |
|---|
| panelIconId | 25b6 |
|---|
| panelIcon | :arrow_forward: |
|---|
| panelIconText | ▶️ |
|---|
| bgColor | #FFC400 |
|---|
| Find out more in the Impact Assessments published on Europeana Pro. |
|