Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Review your narrative

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

You’ve got your draft report. You’ve drafted your narrative, highlighted the key parts with the data, and now it’s time to get some ‘fresh eyes’ to give you feedback on your narrative and to take you one step closer towards publishing and using your findings.

Review: what does it mean and why do we do it?

Review (or peer review) is when others look at and provide a critique on your work. This is usually someone external to your organisation, but not always. These might be the ‘fresh eyes’ you need after validation. You might consider if there is someone or a group that is invested in the programme, therefore, necessary to be involved, or willing to give their feedback or expertise, e.g. if this is a topic of interest to them. Your objective is to know if your interpretation and narrative are robust, and if it makes sense to other people not involved in the activity you are assessing.

WHO

WHY

  • Who could review your interpretation who hasn’t been involved in the programme or activity?

  • Can someone give the report a fresh pair of eyes, to help with editing and proof-reading?

  • Is there anyone that has to see the report before it's published? 

  • Does a funder need to see the report? 

  • Check if the audience understands everything and that the style and language of the report is clear and error-free

  • If you have your head deep in the data and narrative, sometimes small mistakes are hard to see!

  • No labels