Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Developing and measuring indicators of change

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 20 Next »

Intended Learning outcomes

This page is designed to help you:

  • Understand what indicators are and how they differ from outputs and outcomes

  • Prioritise the indicators that are most important to your impact assessment

  • Start mapping indicators to help you measure change

You might already know what you want to measure, based on the outcomes you have mapped. However, it’s important to think about what you want to measure and how you will do this. What indicators will help you know if a change has occurred?


What is an indicator?

An indicator is information that allows us to measure whether you are achieving your desired outcomes. They show whether the outcome has happened or not. When you look at your Change Pathway, the outcome itself might not be what you measure but you might measure something that indicates that the change has taken place. Each outcome could have one or more indicators associated with it.

A good question to ask yourself when thinking about setting indicators is: what kind of ‘proof’ do you want to have before you can claim something has changed as a consequence of your activities?

Explainer - indicators vs. outputs

Indicators can often be confused with outputs, because we are talking about something that is measurable. Outputs are the quantifiable activities of your project. You can see them as the summary of what happened in numbers. Indicators help you to understand and measure if you are achieving your outcomes.

Indicators can be measured in the short-term, medium-term or long-term, and you might also emerge with indicators for your impact.


Subjective and objective indicators

There are two types of indicators. Ideally, you will achieve a balance of objective and subjective indicators. For example, a museum has more visitors to its digital site (objective) but visitors don’t feel that they connect personally to the theme (subjective).

Objective indicators represent facts - for example, income or visits to a museum.

Some examples include:

  • Number of researchers who would recommend Europeana Pro to a colleague or friend (short - long term, quantitative)

  • Number of times Europeana resources are referenced in published research since 2010 (long term, quantitative)

Subjective indicators represent opinions or perceptions - for example, enjoyment or quality of life. 

Such as:

  • Researchers in the Europeana Research Community who report that access to Europeana enables them to complete high quality research (short and/or long term, qualitative)

  • Pupils are more active or enthusiastic after working with an immersive heritage application (short term, qualitative)

Tip

It can be tempting to focus on data that are convenient and easily available rather than on what tells the most important story. Avoid letting convenience determine what you measure.


Learn from others

There may not be one gold list of indicators for us to use, but this doesn’t mean you have to reinvent the wheel. Standard indicators are commonly developed and used in cultural research and in other sectors, as well as in global cross-sector strategic initiatives such as the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Some may not be directly relevant for your work but it’s good practice to see if the data you collect can be comparable or benefit from following others' practices. 

Tip

Use standard indicators when you can. It saves time and makes it easier to draw comparisons with other research using the same indicators. In some cases, comparability might not be important, but you can still learn from others.

You might also want to look at literature, case studies, or similar work that other organisations similar to yours have done. This will help you to further focus on what still needs to be measured.

Take a look at examples of commonly-used indicators used in the cultural sector for inspiration

Cultural indicators - an overview

Prioritisation

It’s not realistic to try to measure every outcome for every stakeholder. In Phase one, you will have prioritised the stakeholders for whom you think you have the greatest impact, or for whom you need to measure the impact of your work. Now, we have the opportunity to think of the outcomes that are most important for these stakeholders and which indicators best help you evidence whether or not these outcomes have occurred. Your goal is to agree which outcomes are your priority to measure, and which you can live without.

We have two ways of thinking of how to prioritise which together helps you to focus on which outcomes are more important to support your vision of impact.

Materiality

Accountability

  • Is the outcome significant enough for the stakeholder for you to measure it?

  • Is it a big or a small change?

  • How important is this change? For whom, and why?

  • Why is it valuable to better understand?

If you had done nothing, how much of this change would have been realised anyway? This is a subjective assessment, but ask yourself:

  • Which outcomes are you responsible for?

  • What do you not need to be responsible for?

  • What does your accountability line tell you? Does it have to change?

Tip

Keep the focus on all the impact you make. It is tempting to focus on collecting data on the positive changes while ignoring the unintended consequences (negative or positive) of your work.


Next step

  • No labels

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.