Panel | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Pros: another opportunity to test your data collection skills; captures anonymous opinions; fast turn-around in terms of input; survey software is readily available. Cons: anonymity is challenging in a small team setting; you have to analyse and report on the collected data which takes time. |
...
Expand | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Please rate your experience. Working on an impact assessment(s) has: [satisfaction scale from completely agree to completely disagree, and N/A option - we used a matrix question format]
If you wish, please explain your answers above. [open text question] Please respond to the following statements [yes / no / N/A]
What do you need to make it easier to use and share the findings of the impact assessments? Please share recommendations if you have them. [open text question] How would you describe working on the impact assessment(s)? You can think about, for example, your personal development and professional practice and whether or not you enjoyed the process. [open text question] How would you rate your confidence level in impact assessment? [scale from 1 - not confident at all to 5 - completely confident]
If you have any other thoughts, recommendations or feedback, including ideas on how to improve how we use impact assessment at Europeana, please share these here. [open text question] What we learnedWe learned that the approach helped everyone involved think more about how their work contributes to sectoral impact. Other results were also broadly positive, but it did show us areas where we should pay more attention, in particular:
|
...
Next steps
https://pro.europeana.eu/page/europeana-standardised-question-bank
Explore a more extended evaluation method - Phase four, option 3 - Team-Based Inquiry (TBI)